Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 33d6

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 85
1
British Bikes / Re: Villiers battery charging system ?
« on: December 17, 2025, 09:41:51 PM »
I can only answer that with the classic response “It depends”. Villiers made made flywheel magneto’s for some 50 odd years and made them by the million. No one knows all the subtleties that arose over the years. Just remember Villiers made these units as matching pairs and numbered them accordingly. It’s easy to check whether they are factory originals. After that you’re on your own.

2
British Bikes / Re: Villiers battery charging system ?
« on: December 17, 2025, 08:12:35 AM »
I’ve hunted out the magnet details for you R. Magnets on the 18 watt job are 1&1/8”wide and the 24watt magnets are 1&7/16”. The difference is in their width.
One has to be careful with Villiers magnetoes. There can be subtle differences that are never mentioned anywhere. For example the overall flywheel width of the near identical post war 10D and 6E engines are different, the 10D is 1&7/8” and the 6E 2&1/16”. I’ve never bothered to measure the actual magnets. This is never mentioned anywhere in any Villiers manual I’ve seen. I suspect it never occurred to Villiers that it would ever become relevant.

3
British Bikes / Re: Villiers battery charging system ?
« on: December 17, 2025, 01:37:07 AM »
We'll have to agree to disagree on that one Rex. Sadly I think the British motorcycle industry dropped the ball badly with their lightweights in the 50s & 60's. I own nothing but British but only of the late 20's with some 30's stuff and when I compare them to models made by the same factories 20 -30 years later I find they're just making an updated version of the same thing with little improvement in economy, performance or braking. Definitely better in suspension related areas but not much else. The expression polishing a t**d comes to mind. Fresh ideas and a fresh approach were needed and it didn't happen.
Although I'm no fan of their odd combined kickstart/gear lever setup I have to admit the Jawa/CZ's of the same period are markedly better and and German two-strokes of the period were magnificent. It's just a pity that their motorcycle industry collapsed when the German economy reached take off point and the average citizen could afford a car leaving two-wheelers behind. As for TWN, a friend had a TWN Contessa scooter and it had no problem maintaining station with the 350 Ariel I was riding at the time. And it had electric start when such a thing was quite exotic.
I enjoy playing with my Villiers stuff but I have no illusions that it could've been better.

 
   

4
British Bikes / Re: Villiers battery charging system ?
« on: December 16, 2025, 11:01:06 AM »
For various reasons I haven't been looking here much lately so have come in at the end of the above chatter. I gather from what has been said on previous occasions that you are writing about your 9D powered Waratah/Excelsior R. If so you don't seem to have a relevant Villiers manual which does make it a little tricky. I'll start with the first question and try to work through them all.
Of course there's no voltage control. Can you think of any British bike of the time that DID have voltage control on an AC system? I think Triumph were more or less the first major factory to fit alternators. They had the same lack of voltage control and those following weren't much better. I remember much unhappiness about batteries boiling dry and other woes in the early years of it all and a distinct lack of enthusiasm about the infamous multi-terminal Lucas combined ignition and lighting switch. What was it? the PS or PSR8? It's no consolation but Villiers were no more and no less ghastly than much more expensive machinery. Let's face it post-war British motorcycle electrics were never world leaders.
Essentially the factories fitted only the one size 6Volt battery, I don't think they had much option. I think it was the only one available and it seems as it acted as some sort of electrical buffer in these systems. They all seemed to revert to the old three brush dynamo idea of a daylight charging rate and a night time head lights on charging rate which never worked particularly well. I'm no electrician, maybe there was some sort of secret to it.
Next, there were two lighting systems used on the 9D. From memory, 18 watt or 24 watt systems. The lower wattage having both fewer coils and smaller magnets. You appear to have the lower wattage cheaper system fitted. Perhaps this was one of the ways the factory differentiated between an Excelsior or a Waratah. I don't know. Whatever, they are both standard Villiers systems of their day but you have to work to the limitations of each.
As for light switches Villiers supplied a relevant light switch for whatever lighting system you used, rectified lighting with a battery or directly off the lighting coils. The four position switch was late on the scene, well after your wee bike. Before Villiers provided this switch to change between steady battery lighting for town use and 'direct' lighting for country running the knowing rider wired in an extra dip switch and used that to flick between the two systems. Eventually it dawned on Villiers that they could add the dip- switch trick to their standard switch and sell it as a standard function but as your bike predates this you could use the extra dip switch concept as being absolutely correct for the time. Just remember that LED's probably wouldn't like the change to direct lighting too much. They're rather keen on a steady current without erratic swings. It's an arrangement for old fashioned bulbs only.
Finally I'm in complete agreement with the idea of a brake/stop light on any bike. I have absolutely no faith in any following traffic.
Anything else I need to cover?   

5
British Bikes / Re: Villiers headlamp switch
« on: October 26, 2025, 05:14:57 AM »
We're going around in circles here. I think the best solution is that of Jferg also occasional forum visitor. When necessary he uses a clip on LED bicycle rear lamp that he has slightly modified to come on with the usual m'cycle stop light switch. This can be easily removed or changed from bike to bike with minimal mucking about. That's an idea worth exploring further. Go and have a look in your local sweatwheel shop, R. You might come away much happier.

6
British Bikes / Re: Villiers headlamp switch
« on: October 23, 2025, 10:48:57 AM »
I understand your lack of concern over lighting. Who does expect to go riding one of these beastliest at night anyway BUT, (there’s always a but) you do occasionally get caught out. Country town rides and rallies have caught me out a few times, somehow you end up at a local riders home or a different pub and bingo, it’s got dark quicker than you expected. I also like to have a brake/stop light fitted. I have little faith in the road users    following behind. Many only react to brake lights and never think beyond them.
You can fit a battery powered total loss system but then you’re always faffing around charging up batteries. Fit a basic direct lighting set up and you always have no hassle lighting but the brake light set up is iffy. There’s never an easy and simple 100% satisfactory solution is there.

I smiled at the 4.5v battery chatter. They can be sheer frustration. I don’t know exactly when they went off the market and I have mucked around making them up from two ‘D’ cells but eventually I got fed up and stopped bothering. I don’t know how many hours light they originally gave but wangling a replacement in and out of that headlight clip every month or so would drive me nuts.

7
British Bikes / Re: Villiers headlamp switch
« on: October 20, 2025, 11:12:53 AM »
Still driving me nuts getting in. Won’t accept my ‘forever’ login and makes me sign in twice but at least I’m here.
Given that the electrics of the 9D changed over its production run and that a specified rear tail lamp bulb for those electrics wasn’t being made post war and no one knew if it would be again things got a little strange at times. The best advice I’ve found for all these circumstances is in Brownings coverage of the 9D in the early editions of his ‘The Villiers engine’ published by Persons, (definitely not Pitmans).
On top of that you need to consider whether you go for either of the Villiers standard options. Direct lighting that only runs when the engine runs or basic rectified lighting with battery but barely practical nowadays or best of all go for broke with modern electronics. Villiers copes with that surprisingly easy.
Do a little more research before you pile in.

8
British Bikes / Re: Villiers headlamp switch
« on: October 18, 2025, 06:16:54 AM »
This is just to say I'm finding it near impossible to get on to this site. I thought it was my old computer which was having various painful bothers but I now have a new computer and if anything things are worse. I've had a real dance around to get on and much emphasis from my new electronic friend about the lack of security involved in getting on.
Does anyone know if Nigel is still supporting it? From the lack of traffic I don't think so.

As for your Villiers switch R I think expecting anything straightforward from any bike produced in the 1945-46 immediate post war period is being very hopeful. As far as I can make out bikes were built up with whatever material manufacturers could get their hands on. The Vic State engine number records show the early post war Excelsior all to be fitted with ex-WD engines. The post war engine numbers start several months later, presumably from a later shipment of bikes. What type of engine number is on your Waratah. Ex-WD AAA****A vertically on the back of the gearbox or post war style on the R/H side gearbox cover? And yes, Villiers seemed to have close links with Miller as they did with Albion but I don't know how formal these were. I've never managed to pin these associations down. Villiers, Miller and Albion have never been treated kindly by the British motorcycle fan base. They seem to find it hard to get beyond the Boring Big Three. C'est la vie.

9
British Bikes / Re: AJS 16M 1951
« on: August 12, 2025, 02:50:10 PM »
Buy both! You can’t have too much info.

10
British Bikes / Re: AJS 16M 1951
« on: August 12, 2025, 05:33:42 AM »
As you know, your AJS is essentially a re-badged Matchless. By far the best owners workshop guide for you is the “MotorCycling” Maintenance Series covering Matchless 350 & 500 cc Heavyweight Singles 1939-1955.
Republished by Bruce Main-Smith Ltd in 1976 and as they say “intended for Matchless but good for AJS too.”

It contains every bit of technical information you’ll ever want to know plus all the technical differences from year to year and lots of clear illustrations. You’ll love it.

A4 landscape size, published by Bruce Main-Smith Ltd and edited by Reg Hide. Get a copy.

11
British Bikes / Re: Villiers centre piece carb MKII: internal dimension?
« on: August 12, 2025, 05:09:39 AM »
I have never seen any information on the internals of the Villiers centrepiece published anywhere….ever. Further to that, as the centrepiece is made in two parts and very tightly assembled, they went to great pains to tell people NOT to disassemble them so as to look at the internals. There is nothing to gain from doing so and every chance of creating problems for yourself if you do.

Over a long period the top hole of the centrepiece may be worn out of true by the working action of the taper needle. Slight wear may be compensated for by a change of needle but for the effort and time wasted to do this and get it right it is far easier to just simply fit a new centrepiece and be done with it.

Villiers may have altered the internal arrangements of the centrepiece several times over its lifetime. We don’t know, we have no way of finding out and does it really matter? Regardless of the internal arrangements the MW carb on your Mk XIIC still runs best with a number 2 centrepiece. That is all we need to know for successful operation.

12
British Bikes / Re: Villiers centre piece carb MKII: internal dimension?
« on: August 11, 2025, 02:43:51 AM »
The Mk II designation on the underside of the float bowl refers to general improvements across the whole Villiers carburettor range. It serves no other purpose and has no role in identifying any individual part or individual carburettor. Ignore it.

Your 1 1/8" carburettor is a Villiers MW (Medium Weight). It is intended for use with a Villiers lever throttle NOT a later self closing twistgrip throttle.

The Mk XIIC was fitted with the MW (Medium Weight) carburettor as standard. It was set up with a number 2 jet (the centrepiece) and a number 4 taper needle. Both the jet (centrepiece) and taper needle are stamped with the relevant numbers. Be aware it is very easy for the MW needle and centrepiece to be confused with the similar but shorter parts used in the Villiers LW (Light Weight) carburettor. It is easy to confuse the two.

If all parts are in good condition with the float level set to Villiers specifications the carburettor will work exactly as the maker intended without any further adjustment. Please note there is often a difference between what the maker intended and what a current owner thinks it should do. 

13
British Bikes / Re: Villiers engine in 1930s Waratah
« on: July 04, 2025, 02:14:17 PM »
Given that we know catalogue illustrations of any make can have errors and makers were not unknown to send the odd NQR (Not Quite Right) model out here. I can never get too excited about minor  differences.

Personally I go along with Cardans “commercial pragmatism”, with Excelsior juggling the demands of the Australian Excelsior agent (whoever they were) plus William Bros Waratah plus using up as much redundant stock cheaply as possible as they could get away with. We’ll never know all the minor differences and does it really matter?

As for the myriad of differences between the various Villiers 250’s I'm not surprised at the odd publication getting them tangled up. I do the same. With the massive amount of wordage generated about them all a serious reader knows better than taking all these reports at literal face value. There’s bound to be a certain percentage of mistakes.

Do we need to know more or do we know enough?

14
British Bikes / Re: Villiers engine in 1930s Waratah
« on: July 04, 2025, 12:40:40 AM »
Yes we do. We went down that rabbit hole exhaustively some time back. You’ll have todo a little exploration of earlier posts.


15
British Bikes / Re: Villiers engine in 1930s Waratah
« on: July 03, 2025, 02:13:03 PM »
I’d expect that to be a Mk16A, 67x70mm bore & stroke, made 1934-40.mainly viewed as the standard 250cc workhorse of the range.
Villiers made a surprising range of 250’s in that period. With Autolube system or petroil, air cooled, water cooled, short stroke or long stroke, flattop piston, deflector top piston, long bush plain main bearings or ball race with seals. Yer pays yer money and takes yer pick.
The 16A was about as standard as it got. Petroil, deflector piston, long bush plain mains. Well tested technology but will plonk along forever.
That particular Waratah looks very much like the 1938 Excelsior Meritor.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 85