Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Rex

Pages: 1 ... 109 110 [111] 112
1651
British Bikes / Re: What are they worth??
« on: May 22, 2008, 04:15:53 PM »
Depends where in the world you are.
In the UK the BSA would be £2500-£3000 in good useable condition, and the Nortie slightly less.
Google the bikes to see if any have been sold in your locale recently.
Don't believe any visiting valuer/dealer who gives it the old "no call for those things anymore" spiel; they're both nice bikes and well worth owning.

1652
British Bikes / Re: New Triumph owner needs help !
« on: May 03, 2008, 05:27:33 PM »
Quote
Glad I found you guys! I am the proud new owner of a Triumph 1955 T110 and I have a lot to learn. Last Bike I owned was a  Suzuki in 1983. I am however not unfamiliar with British engineering, I own a 1965 Jaguar E type. I have ordered some repair manuals from ebay, along with some Whitworth tools, but have a few dumb questions that cant wait to be answered. 1) The bike runs great, but there is no battery, just wires hanging,  lights work only at high revs, is this a 6 volt system ?

Yes, and probably a mag too.

 What kind of Battery do I need. I know that it would be easy to fry something if I don't know what I'm doing.

The largest 6V one you can fit in the space.

 Is there an explanation of the wiring / magneto online somewhere ?

Likely, but a manual is better


 (2) Second dumb question, did this bike have a side stand, if so where can I find a replacement

Should have a lug on the bottom frame tube, if it did. Google "Triumph" and should bring up many suppliers in the US(?) Same for the parts below.


 (3)I need to find the "Triumph" script for the gas tank. (4) Is anyone reproducing the nacelle, I have only a chrome headlight with no speedometer or switches.

1653
British Bikes / Re: What is a classic motorcyle
« on: May 01, 2008, 07:33:01 AM »
Funnily enough, they do. And MZs, CZs, late model Jappas of all sorts, and other assorted gray porridge... ;D

1654
British Bikes / Re: People in Photos
« on: April 02, 2008, 06:48:04 PM »
Bloke on the left in the second pic could pass for Mr Chumley-Warner.

1655
British Bikes / Re: t100s rebore
« on: April 02, 2008, 06:45:19 PM »
If the smoke clears quickly, there's probably no problem.
As long as it starts and runs, IIAB,DFI...as they say ;)

1656
British Bikes / Re: Tank sealant
« on: March 24, 2008, 10:19:58 PM »
Yes, and if you want to go to the web-site and actually view and buy something, you'll have to use .co.uk.
Thanks again for the link, and feel free to have the last word, if it's important.

BTW, you can't be "a pedantic". The word is "pedant".

1657
British Bikes / Re: Tank sealant
« on: March 23, 2008, 05:19:27 PM »
No call for any of that. My correction was info for anyone else who may need this stuff, not to be "clever" to you.



1658
British Bikes / Re: Tank sealant
« on: March 22, 2008, 10:20:10 PM »
Thanks, I've paid for a tin of sealant remover; hope it does what it says on the tin!
BTW it's .co.uk at the end, not .com

1659
British Bikes / Tank sealant
« on: March 22, 2008, 05:12:15 PM »
Has anyone ever found a way to remove petrol/gas tank sealer?
One of my tanks has been done badly, so I need to remove it and redo it.
The local Dip'n'Strip place failed, as did NitroMors paint stripper, and I'm getting desperate!

1660
British Bikes / Re: 6 or 12 volt
« on: March 19, 2008, 09:11:00 PM »
12V every time. Better lights, cheaper (and more choice) batteries, bulbs from any car parts place, solid state rectifiers,etc etc.
The question should be "why NOT convert?" as it's so cheap and easy.

1661
British Bikes / Re: I'll Bet ....
« on: February 13, 2008, 06:25:04 AM »
And it was taken on top of Portsdown Hill looking South probably near the Nelson Memorial, at 10.32 am.
OK, I made that last bit up..... :) but as there used to be regular commemorations of Nelson's life by the Senior Service, you can bet that's what these two skates are doing there.

1662
British Bikes / Re: original or chopper?
« on: January 10, 2008, 05:17:04 PM »
Choppers went out with Donny Osmond and platform shoes.
Boring then and boring now.
People who build custom bikes (Bobbers are in now) tend to build from bits sourced from Ebay or swapmeets, but ripping up an original bike is both crass and expensive.
Far better to sell the bike to a rider who'll use it, then build what you want with the money.

1663
British Bikes / Re: Extortionate Nuts and Bolts
« on: December 22, 2007, 05:48:09 AM »
No, definitely NOT desirable.
Good point made about sub-standard imported bolts too, and is why I'd always use a cleaned up and replated original bolt over a new "replacement" any day.
There really IS more to choosing and using nuts and bolts than the ease of buying new shiny ones.......

1664
British Bikes / Re: Extortionate Nuts and Bolts
« on: December 19, 2007, 11:25:41 PM »
You really have to be realistic. If the machine is not intended as a show-piece but as a useable mode of transport/fun, then why not use whatever is best/easily obtainable.
If a metric nut and bolt can be used where a Whitworth, or whatever was, then use it. Not everyone walks around with a micrometer or vernier guage and is about to pounce on your bike with a thread pitch guage.

It's about doing a "good" job. As the Imperial stuff is readily available there's no excuse for fitting metric fasteners.
As someone else has said, if nothing else it means only one set of spanners needed, and that's apart from the rather obvious metric bolt markings (ie no vernier needed).





If, as some would like, you go for purity, then you should have crappy tyres, crappy lights and ride with goggles and a cork helmet/flat cap or none at all.

That's taking the debate to the ridiculous extreme....

Originality has it's place but practicality and common sense must prevail.

Agreed, but there's STILL no reason to fit metric fasteners...... :)

1665
British Bikes / Re: Extortionate Nuts and Bolts
« on: December 19, 2007, 06:59:59 AM »
Quote
Rex,

"One good reason why not is that it looks so f*****g awful! "

So, just to play devils advocate here, to the untrained (or uninterested) eye, a metric hex head is only superficially different to an imperial. Does this mean the substitution of old fashioned zinc or cadmium plated parts for stainless constitute the same originality faux pas?


Using plated nuts etc is very different from using cheap metric replacements; one is a different thread and size, the other merely a shinier finish, and YOU'D know the difference.....




It's a dialemma for me right now - I have a 1959 T120 which would be quite valuable if it were restored to concours originality, but to be truly original it needs cheap, plated nuts, bolts and spokes. Yet, if I fitted it with stainless it could be devalued despite the obvious advantages. Whaddya do?

Please don't spoil a 59 Bonnie with crappy metric fasteners. Many (including me) would see nothing inherently wrong in using stainless parts, but certainly would in using metric stuff, whatever the finish......

Pages: 1 ... 109 110 [111] 112