Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - R

Pages: 1 ... 59 60 [61] 62 63 ... 103
901
Identify these bikes! / Re: Identify this head and barrel please
« on: September 09, 2015, 11:20:52 PM »
Anyway I need to sell it and before I do that it would be nice to know what I was trying to sell, mainly because there can't be another one along like me.

I think the fact you have had no replies means we are all in the same boat. !
I've looked at that, and not readily found a match, or anything like it really.
If you put it on fleabay with enough names to attract attention, someone will likely be able to tell you.
Along with 10 (?) who just throw in stray suggestions....
Good Luck !

902
Identify these bikes! / Re: Help identifying a gearbox
« on: September 09, 2015, 11:16:06 PM »
I would have picked that as a smaller 2 stud sturmey archer, but am not entirely familiar with early Albions.

What motorcycle is associated with this, the specs or brochure usually say what gearbox it came with,
new buyers being a discerning lot...

903
Identify these bikes! / Re: what have i got here then
« on: September 09, 2015, 11:11:35 PM »
The reason that number seemed familiar is because its the 1st of one of the (many) contracts for WD/C models.
http://www.robvanmeel.nl/?q=content/royal-enfield-c-spares-list-c71827890-f-5901-1550036p
There is no pic shown here, but the applicable numbers are shown on the front cover of the parts books,
and a new parts book was issued with each new contract.

Jan, the military specialist with the Royal Enfield Club would be interested in those numbers.
He is compiling a big list of them all, and sorting out what features came with which numbers.
Enfields made quite a few of these and the subsequent WD/CO models = a lot of changes (mostly minor).
Parts used to be plentiful for these, but seem to be dwindling, is your bike complete-ish ?

904
Identify these bikes! / Re: what have i got here then
« on: September 09, 2015, 12:45:51 AM »
Post the pics to somewhere like photobucket and show the link here,
if you can't readily downsize them.

Its sounds like its going to be an ex military Royal Enfield WD/C,
a little sidevalve 350.
Have you posted these same details somewhere else, it seems familar ?

Does it look like this ?
http://www.weaponsofwwii.com/forumfiles/Tanks/PMVR/Private/P6090078.JPG

This is possibly the prettiest wd about, although the colour is usually a (much) darker shade of olive.
These were Enfields military model early in WW2, before the military requested more uumph,
and the ohv CO model was supplied. Although they looked similar, very little was actually interchangeable.

905
British Bikes / Re: oil tank cleaning
« on: September 09, 2015, 12:36:59 AM »
Flushing it out with degreaser or kero or even petrol has to be worth a try first.
If you can seal up all the exits, it can be shaken quite vigorously.
Watch that this is somewhat flammable though, no smoking...

If this doesn't do it, it could be steam cleaned - and the paint preserved.
This may promote rust inside though, so it would need to be oiled pronto.

Or, it could be flushed with a solution of drain cleaner = caustic soda.
This absolutely eats oil and gunge.
It also eats paintwork, so you have to be very careful to keep it all inside.
Wear gloves, a really strong solution and flesh don't mix.
take care, hopethishelps.

906
Japanese Bikes / Re: yamaha 1981 750 shaft
« on: September 06, 2015, 07:59:20 AM »
A google search turns up a number of mentions of an XJ750 yamahahaha
They were around then, model went for a number of years, sold squillions and had shaft drive.

http://motorbike-search-engine.co.uk/classic_bikes/YAMAHA-XJ-750.jpg

907
British Bikes / Re: Rare for all the wrong reasons
« on: August 28, 2015, 05:26:20 AM »



If only...
If they'd built them as a 500cc flat twin,
then they would have become a 1000cc flat four,
and 1500cc and then 1800cc sixes.
And Goldwings wouldn't have got a look in ?
If only......


908
British Bikes / Re: Vintage white wall tyres.
« on: August 22, 2015, 02:05:16 AM »
Why find a sidevalve JAP when it already has a sidevalve SturmeyArcher though ?

Getting it running with whatever is to hand is likely to take decades less than finding all the 'correct parts ?,
and coercing someone to part with them.  Especially if the budget is limited....

You seem to have completely misconstrued my words too, so its tough to reply to that ?!

909
British Bikes / Re: Vintage white wall tyres.
« on: August 21, 2015, 11:01:10 PM »
If I can get a JAP 350cc OHV engine & Burman Gear box and a I will fit them.
So if anyone has them and wants to swop with a Nice 350cc Sturmey Archer SV engine & Albion 3 speed gear box let me know.
As usual money is always a factor.
I can only do my best.

On that basis, some of us think that you should build it with what you have.
This penchant for rebuilding things utterly factory has got to stop !!
Removing all the history along the way....

With the proviso though that if things don't fit, you won't resort to chopping off any stray brackets or bits,
but rather fab up brackets spacers etc to suit.

Look forward to hearing how it goes.

910
British Bikes / Re: excelsior two stroke exhausts
« on: August 18, 2015, 12:25:17 AM »
I have a nos Norton muffler with auger baffles in it (not removeable though), so the auger part is a common type of baffle.
No idea if its correct for your Excelsior though. Being removeable suggests it was for 2 stroke use, so you are part way there.
 2 strokes back then weren't terribly scientific, so if it quietened it down was probably enough.
All you can do is try it and see how it goes.

911
British Bikes / Re: Vintage white wall tyres.
« on: August 17, 2015, 12:00:26 AM »
That brochure pic of the New Henley doesn't appear to have a 21" front wheel, is that your model ?

912
British Bikes / Re: Vintage white wall tyres.
« on: August 16, 2015, 12:35:22 AM »
It wouldn't have had these originally ?, so no-one is likely to be supplying them ?
Probably means you will have to have them painted on.


913
British Bikes / Re: 1902 New Hudson
« on: July 23, 2015, 10:22:30 PM »
Since a surface carb won't work with the heavier fuels, particularly in cold weather, many 1902 bikes like the New Hudson were obsolete in 1903.

What about with a change of carburettor though, is this possible ?
The motorcycling press of a few years later and later had an armada of carb types for sale, as replacements for the fitted OEM.
Updating to the latest was a way of life, even back then ?

914
British Bikes / Re: 1902 New Hudson
« on: July 23, 2015, 09:38:55 AM »
No moths in the muffler then !!
Did he say what it smelled like ?

Power kerosene was a very good fuel - quite unlike lighting kerosene, which burns very sooty.
Difficult to start it with though, folks have said.

915
British Bikes / Re: 1902 New Hudson
« on: July 23, 2015, 06:52:15 AM »
Shellite is available from industrial suppliers, as a solvent in 20L drums.
It is listed as a light naptha product.
Probably no fuel excise on it either, so in bulk it may be inexpensive.

What would these bikes have run on when new ??

Fuel for many years (decades ?) came in square 5 (?) gal tins.
Before the era of the fuel pump.
Aircraft owners were warned to always only used unopened tins.
probably applied to discerning motorists too...

Pages: 1 ... 59 60 [61] 62 63 ... 103