Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 33d6

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 80
31
British Bikes / Re: There's an article..
« on: August 22, 2023, 01:09:41 PM »
It’s pretty disappointing. The author obviously hasn’t been following what’s been going on here but I suppose if you live up in Gympie it’s a bit hard to keep in touch.

32
British Bikes / Simplex in South Australia?
« on: August 22, 2023, 02:51:52 AM »
I’ve now cleaned up the Simplex engine number records and can answer the odd question about them but want to ask one of my own.
Simplex were sold by Turner Bros, 291 Elizabeth St, but in the back of my mind is that they had strong South Oz connections? That they were just a branch of a South Oz firm? That they also sold Levis that were imported through South Oz? Whatever the case, I mentally associate Turner Bros with South Oz.
If so, did they also sell Simplex there. Simplex numbers are low compared to the Utility. For the number involved it doesn’t seem worth the bother.

33
British Bikes / Re: Ariel VG 1950
« on: August 21, 2023, 09:15:54 AM »
Yes, no hurry with the carb. A 1” will keep you happy until the right one comes along. I’d be more interested to ensure it has the right oil pump. 1950 was the first year of the upgraded oil pump with 1/4” diameter inlet shaft but who knows what has been done in the 70 years since.
The bottom end upgrade to Red Hunter essentially just entails fitting roller bearings instead of ball. I remember lovingly doing this to my 600cc VB Ariel being convinced no one rode their side valve slogger as hard as rode mine. (I’ve always been a dreamer). Then again, it was still running strong when I sold it in England, a long way from home and it remains the only motorcycle I’ve ridden up the Champs Élysée and round the Arc de Triomphe roundabout.
As you can gather, I rather like Ariel singles.

34
British Bikes / Re: Fantasy dating: a "1914" Excelsior Villiers for sale
« on: August 21, 2023, 08:30:39 AM »
Unfortunately my Excelsior library doesn’t go any further back than 1920. My 1913-1924 Motor Cycle Index only includes Excelsior from 1921 and my 1920 Olympia Show catalogue describes what is being shown on each stand but has next to no illustrations. Note it describes what is on a specific stand but not the whole makers range. For a 298 page catalogue it’s remarkably unhelpful.
The Motor Cycle Index is helpful as it lists the makers whole range for each year and gives a full specification of each model. Interestingly it lists the Villiers powered Excelsior as having Albion boxes not Burman as shown on the auction bike.
It’s a pretty little bike but I suspect its dodgy provenance is causing a steady roll over of owners. A veteran Excelsior with a Pioneer Certificate is an entirely different beast from an early vintage era bike with veteran performance.

35
British Bikes / Re: Fantasy dating: a "1914" Excelsior Villiers for sale
« on: August 21, 2023, 02:53:18 AM »
I’m rather curious as to the auction house’s position when the new owner gets their Pioneer Certificate application knocked back. It’s one thing to be just on the wrong side of a particular date but to be so many years out is a different matter.

36
Japanese Bikes / Re: Marusho Lilac Le Mans
« on: August 04, 2023, 07:38:51 AM »
I had a quick look through the cards and found records for two only of the Electra. Engine numbers R2/0615 and the other R2/1108.
R2/0615 was in frame number F9-0609 and first registered DK 631 on 10/3/67 and re-registered JS 310 on 12/7/74.
R2/1108 was first registered DT 229 on 16/7/68. No more known.

I think the Le Mans Motors comment answers the Le Mans badge name question. We had yet to  come to terms with Japanese naming conventions back then and perhaps it was thought Lilac was a step too far for many riders?


37
Japanese Bikes / Re: Marusho Lilac Le Mans
« on: August 04, 2023, 02:41:33 AM »
The majority of Lilacs in Victoria were first registered as Le Mans. I haven’t counted them to get the exact number but there’s about 50 of them with about a dozen or so registered as Lilacs—- and some of those are duplicates of bikes originally registered as a LeMans. It seems that years later down the track if a bike was returned to the road the Le Mans bit was long forgotten so it treated as a first time registration and the paperwork filed as a Lilac.
It’s all very odd and I’d like to know why.
As it is it’s taken a bit of faffing about to record and reorganise this stuff so Lilac owners can actually track down their bikes history I’d like to know the story behind it.

38
Japanese Bikes / Marusho Lilac Le Mans
« on: August 03, 2023, 01:38:43 AM »
I’ve been ploughing through the old registration records for my home state of Victoria in Aus and came across a Le Mans motorcycle. Not thé Moto Guzzi Le Mans but just plain Le Mans, all dating from the 1959-61 period.

After much faffing about I’ve ascertained these were actually Lilac 250 and 300cc  transverse vee twins and I’m now wondering if anyone out there can tell me why they were sold here under the Le Mans banner rather than Lilac.

It’s no great drama, just a matter of cleaning up an administrative mess as I also have Lilac records some of which are duplicates of the Le Mans records. The eventual aim is simply to be able to provide any owners of surviving Lilacs an accurate record of what came to Victoria.

39
XXA 20610 first registered 17/5/46 as a Malvern Star, number plate 3468. Maybe the first owners surname was Henderson?

40
Back to the Melbourne Mobylette. Victoria changed over to alphanumeric number plates in 1951.
In fact the first one, AA 001 was issued to a 1933 MOV Velocette on 17/9/51 so the Mobylette AS 043 is probably late ‘52 or early ‘53. That’s the closest I can get. The changeover from all numeric to the new alphanumeric was erratic as it seems they continued to issue old style plates alongside the new type until stocks were exhausted.

Finally, by this time Bruce Small was moving out of two-wheelers and into real estate. He could see that’s where the big money was. I don’t think his heart was in Mobylettes.

41
Being engine number cards they are obviously stored in engine number sequence regardless of any prefix, suffix or whatever. I've been going through them trying to make some sense of them and can tell you the following;
The very earliest numbers must be the two prototypes. These are XX694 and XX699. These are 1939 Junior de Luxe numbers. Villiers then seem to have done some tweaking so the XX was replaced with XXA. Supposedly Villiers used this letter engine identifier prefix until until fairly soon postwar when they changed to an entirely numeric system and all engines thereafter have a 3 figure number identifier prefix except they soon ran up to 999 so had to start again adding a letter after the number so ***A, then ***B in due course and so on.
Using this system the post war Malvern Star Junior de Luxe are prefixed either 586 or S586. I've never discovered where the "S" came from but it's there. Just another little Malvern Star/Villiers mystery. Supposedly this is around 1946-47.
Theoretically then we should have a set of XXA engines with lowish numbers followed by a set of postwar 586 engines with rather higher numbers--- except that we don't.
We have instead XXA engines ranging from 16838 to 50032 (highest number listed) found in 6 batches with XXA's generally fading out around 1948 with the 586 engines numbers ranging from 1039 t0 18439 found in 7 batches mainly in the 1947-50 period. Then we have the 716 2 speed 1F engine numbers ranging from 5946 to 29311 found in 4 batches with most in the early 50's.
It does seem that Villiers delivered orders in some sort of drip feed system and that they retained the engine number prefix until that particular order was complete even though it could be quite some time after that specicfic prefix was supposedly done and dusted.
On top of all this we have interstate blow-ins, ex-NSW, ex Qld, plus Leons batch of 'refurbished" machines all with Vic rego dates all over the place.
Of course we don't know how Malvern Star dealt with these engines. Were the engines assembled into bikes in the order that were received or did the assembler just take the next one off the shelf. Trying to nut out how an Australian firm did business when having to rely on overseas supply of major components is enough to make your ears bleed.
Any questions? 

42
I’m away from home at the moment. Will give an unexpected answer in due course.
I did bring the 1945, (15), 1946, (55) and 1947,(76) rego figures with me hoping for an opportunity to give them.
Can’t say much more until  I return home.

43
Hi Leon
I can’t answer all questions as of yet but will start the ball rolling.
The Malvern /Mobylette card has very little info. The engine number is 65854, it had been registered twice, first time reg number AS 043 but the date of registration was left blank. NEVER seen that before and I’ve now looked at a monumental number of these cards now. The second registration was on 22.10.55 and the number issued was BH 736. For those in other countries with different systems under the Victorian reg system the number plate is only valid while the registration is paid. The number plate reverts to the State if the fee isn’t paid.
Secondly I counted 265 registrations for 1F powered machines. Except for the few blow ins and the solitary 2F powered machines the rest were all fitted with JDL’s.
More info soon.

44
I've now transcribed all the Malvern Star cards recording engine number and the first time it was registered in Victoria and can say the following. Remember, Victorian registrations only.
There were 985 cards most of which were straight Malvern Star machines but some peculiar blow ins as well. The clip on engine era really confused the Registration branch so what they did was record the make of bicycle as the vehicle, so Malvern Star bicycles with clip ons attached are here also. There are two Berini, two Cyclemaster and two Cucciolo plus a couple were they didn't actually say what the make of engine was but recorded an engine number advising it belonged to a 1/4hp, 25cc engine. There was a single 2F powered MS plus another that had its original 1F engine replaced with a 2F. One power crazed enthusiast replaced his 1F with a 125cc 9D engine. Finally, there was a solitary Malvern Star/Mobylette.
There was some wartime production but not a great deal. Malvern Star may have had the engines but we've already read how they had issues making all the other bits and pieces needed to make a complete machine. Anyway, annual war years registrations were as follows. 1941 - 2, 1942 - 2, 1943 - 3, 1944 - 25, 1945 - 4 up until VE Day and I couldn't remember the month of VJ Day. Thats the minimum as there are hints that wartime record keeping wasn't as accurate as it could be. Many reasons for that at the time of course. In view of world events I don't think there was anyone there carefully dotting every i or crossing every t. The odd one got missed out. I'll do a bit more looking around now I have all cards in a countable format.
Last thing, there appears to have been two prototypes. One was the first 1941 registration the other quite a bit later.
Any questions?

45
Whacko, going back through that old thread plus skimming through the bicycle forum thread shows I don’t need to worry about the frame numbers except confirm the autocycle numbering system fits in with the general Malvern Star system of the period. Which basically was known already. That’s one job ticked off.
I was also pleased to to see the bicycle thread covered braced forks on Army bikes so the braced forks on the initial style autocycle were no novelty to the factory.
Finally, I liked the remark about the factory using whatever building materials they could lay their hands on for Army bikes due to wartime shortages. I believe that ran through to the autocycles as well.
Good stuff Leon.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 80