Author Topic: 1902 New Hudson  (Read 19000 times)

Offline cardan

  • Advanced Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1216
  • Karma: +19/-5
    • View Profile
    • earlymotor.com
    • Email
Re: 1902 New Hudson
« Reply #15 on: July 24, 2015, 01:10:05 AM »

Yes a spray carburettor was a possible update, and many surviving 1902 bikes have one fitted at some time between 1903 and 2015. This bike, luckily, didn't get the update and remained in the original shop where it was unsold in 1902. The tank and enclosed carburettor, coil and battery box were part of the kit supplied by Minerva with the motor. All threads on the tank and controls are metric; all threads on the bicycle itself are BSCy.

Leon

Offline mark2

  • Advanced Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 383
  • Karma: +2/-4
    • View Profile
Re: 1902 New Hudson
« Reply #16 on: July 24, 2015, 05:34:57 PM »
 I thought this was interesting . in 1896, an automotive development that did not receive headlines was announced. Dr. Wilhelm Maybach and Gottlieb Daimler of Germany had teamed up to build a motor car possessing a new device called a float-type spray carburetor -- a "gadget" that's still with us.

According to an 1898 issue of Automobil-Zeitung, a German automotive publication, the Maybach carburetor was "a major improvement over the brush-type atomizer and the wick carburetor."

The atomizer was the carburetion device used on the first motor car equipped with a gasoline engine, built by Siegfried Marcus in 1875. Between Marcus and Maybach, Dr. F. W. Lanchester, a British automotive pioneer, built motor cars that used wick carburetors.

The rotary-brush atomizer used by Marcus was an integrated fuel reservoir and feed unit. As the pulley-driven brush revolved, it picked gas out of the reservoir and threw it into the air. The suction effect created by the pistons drew the mixture into the engine.

Lanchester's wick carburetor improved on the atomizer. It consisted of several compartments. The bottom compartment held fuel. Wicks extending from a compartment above became saturated with fuel.

Getting vapors given off by the wicks to mix with air was achieved by drawing air into the compartment above the fuel storage area. The fuel/air vapors then flowed to the engine, passing first through wire mesh that served to filter out impurities. This was the world's first carburetor fuel filter.

There's a fact about filtration you may find interesting. Until refining methods were improved (about 1910), cars came equipped with swatches of chamois. These were used by car owners to filter impurities from gas before pouring it into the fuel tank. Before drive-in stations, gas was sold by hardware and drug stores.

Maybach's float-type carburetor was, in retrospect, and invention of revolutionary proportions. Its survival for this many years tends to prove this. You probably know how it works: Gas from a fuel supply tank flows by gravity into the carburetor's float chamber or bowl. As gas fills the bowl, it causes a float (Maybach used a float made of sheet metal) to rise. When the float reaches a certain height, it forces a needle valve to close, which halts the flow or fuel to the engine.

The float allowed Maybach to attain a consistent flow of fuel to the engine. Unlike the atomizer and wick carburetors, the float carburetor lessened the tendency of engines to flood.

Maybach's carburetor possessed a second chamber called the mixing chamber. It was there that gas from the float chamber mixed with air. The mixture was drawn up into the engine as pistons dropping in the cylinders created a vacuum.

Note that the fuel mixture was drawn up into the engine. The Maybach carburetor was an updraft unit, an approach to carburetion that lasted until the late 1920s, when the first cam-operated mechanical fuel pump was invented. This invention permitted automakers to move fuel tanks to the rear of their cars and place carburetors high on the engine.

Between the gravity-feed system and the advent of cam-operated fuel pumps, fuel was pushed from a rear-mounted tank to the carburetor by air pressure. This required large vacuum reservoirs between fuel tanks and carburetors. It's interesting to note what the 1928 edition of The Modern Gasoline Automobile had to say about a disadvantage of this system:

"The air pressure pump system often gives trouble, requiring a hand air pump near the driver in order to return to the garage."

Automakers had to put hand pumps in cars. When the automatic air pump system failed -- which it often did -- a driver would use the hand pump to feed fuel to the engine.

As we said, the Maybach float carburetor was first used in a car built by Maybach and Daimler. This was before Daimler and Karl Benz joined forces to form the company that now builds Mercedes-Benz automobiles and produces Mercedes-Benz parts.

Do you wonder why the cars are called Mercedes-Benz and not Daimler-Benz? When Daimler and Maybach were associated, Emil Jellinek (who was the Austro-Hungarian consul in Nice, France) was a passionate client of Daimler cars which he successfully raced. He promoted Daimler cars with his friends as an "un-official" dealer. When he ordered a large batch of cars, he also suggested that Daimler change the name of their cars, taking into account the French hostility towards German products, stemming from the still-well-remembered Franco-Prussian war of 1870 (which France disastrously lost). Therefore, he suggested they use a French-sounding name. Since he represented a sizeable share of Daimler sales, Daimler obliged by giving their cars the name of Jellinek's daughter: Mercedes. Since these cars won a number of races in France thus giving the newly named "Mercedes" a good reptation, Daimler decided to apply that name to their cars everywhere. The Mercedes name went with Daimler when he joined Benz.

As automaking took off, so did road building and development of more powerful engines operated at varying speeds. Fuel-on-demand became a critical factor that the original Maybach design couldn't fulfill. Refinements came hot and heavy.

One of the earliest was through the efforts of two men -- Butler of Great Britain and Venturi of Italy. They didn't know one another. In fact, they lived 100 years apart.

In the 1790s, Venturi discovered that by reducing the bore of a pipe, he was able to increase the velocity of fluid and got it to break (atomize) into smaller particles. Around 1900, Butler applied the Venturi principle to a float-type carburetor. He narrowed its throat (or venturi, as we call it now). Doing this allowed greater protection against engine flooding.

Improvements to the Maybach design between 1900 and the late 1920s led to the jet-compensated carburetor, which is still with us. This unit uses jet circuits, air bleeds, vacuum-operated economizer valves and throttle-operated metering rods to attain the correct fuel/air ratios for various speeds and loads.

Other significant fuel-system developments were:
•The first dash-mounted gas gauge by Studebaker in 1914.
•The first carburetor air cleaner, introduced on the 1915 Packard Twin Six. The 1922 Rickenbacker used the dry-type air cleaner.
•The first thermostatic automatic choke, which was introduced on the 1932 Oldsmobile. The design has remained basically the same to this day.
•The first four-barrel carburetor -- by Buick in 1941.

Back in 1910, Adams Farwell of Dubuque, Iowa, pioneered a non-carbureted fuel system called fuel injection, refined and adopted for diesel engines. But it wasn't until after World War II that thought was given to putting it on spark-ignited gasoline engines.

In 1949, Automotive Digest said, "Some automotive men feel that fuel injection for passenger automobiles is nearing the climax in experimentation and may soon make its bow to the driving public." What happened? Nothing -- the carburetor remained king for another 35 years.

Offline murdo

  • Advanced Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 445
  • Karma: +9/-1
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: 1902 New Hudson
« Reply #17 on: July 24, 2015, 10:56:21 PM »
Very interesting.

Offline pete at occhiolungo

  • Advanced Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: 1902 New Hudson
« Reply #18 on: October 12, 2015, 11:18:38 PM »
I'm late, but congratulations Leon! The bike looks and sounds wonderful. And you're the perfect keeper for it. :)

Regarding the other posting about spray carbs, Maybach did some good work with his invention. But Edward Butler had done his previously. He sometimes doesn't get the credit that he deserves.

Offline cardan

  • Advanced Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1216
  • Karma: +19/-5
    • View Profile
    • earlymotor.com
    • Email
Re: 1902 New Hudson
« Reply #19 on: October 13, 2015, 01:13:12 AM »

Thanks Pete. Just back from the National Veteran Rally (Australia) where I notched up 4-500 km on my 1909 water-cooled Australian-made Lewis, over 6 days. Just a couple of small problems: (a) the bearing cup in the front Chater Lea hub unwound as I was riding down the road - note to other riders with CL or Douglas hubs: tighten your lock rings and makes sure the wheel is fitted so that the adjustable bearing UNWINDS (embarrassment only) rather than TIGHTENS (nasty crash) and (b) the float on my new-condition impossibly-rare 1909 AMAC carburettor (cool operating levers!) decided to sink on the 5th day. Drained of petrol and re-soldered for trouble-free final day's ride.

I've fallen in love with the Lewis, even if the cruising speed is only about 40kph (25mph).

Leon


Offline murdo

  • Advanced Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 445
  • Karma: +9/-1
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: 1902 New Hudson
« Reply #20 on: October 13, 2015, 08:18:03 AM »
Looks nice, good to see such a rare piece back on the road.

Offline R

  • Advanced Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1517
  • Karma: +26/-10
    • View Profile
Re: 1902 New Hudson
« Reply #21 on: October 13, 2015, 11:27:41 PM »
even if the cruising speed is only about 40kph (25mph).

May we ask why that may be ?

A big single with liquid cooling should be able to lope along or go hell for leather, so to speak.
Maybe a bigger belt drive pulley ??
Or does the kettle boil easily.....

Offline cardan

  • Advanced Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1216
  • Karma: +19/-5
    • View Profile
    • earlymotor.com
    • Email
Re: 1902 New Hudson
« Reply #22 on: October 14, 2015, 01:17:09 AM »

A big single maybe, but this is a little one - 3 h.p. and about 375cc from memory. Add to the low power the weight of a gallon of water, a cylinder with water jacket, and the soldered-up brass radiator (Lewis had an Australian patent), leaf spring and so on... I got it running with a c1913 B&B carburettor which is "modern" in design, but the 1909 AMAC is more primitive, with a couple of 90 degree bends and some unusual obstacles and the performance is a little less. For me the originality that comes from a rare period carby far outweighs the performance gain from fitting a later part.

Cruising at 40kph is lovely. I suppose it would run along at 50 or even 60 on the flat if you had the urge, but it has a cast iron piston, bronze bushes, splash oiling and so on which leads me to travel at a slow-but-comfortable rate. It will climb most main road hills with some light pedal assistance.

Boiling? It was 33C on a couple of days of the rally, and it was endearing to have the bike talk to me after I stopped, and the air stopped flowing through the radiator. Very gentle boiling and not for too long. I've taken to calling the bike "Tea's Made"!

Leon

Offline cardan

  • Advanced Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1216
  • Karma: +19/-5
    • View Profile
    • earlymotor.com
    • Email
Re: 1902 New Hudson
« Reply #23 on: October 14, 2015, 01:31:40 AM »

The 1909 (only) AMAC carb. The throttle valve and the extra air valves owe much in design to the bath plug!

Leon

Offline R

  • Advanced Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1517
  • Karma: +26/-10
    • View Profile
Re: 1902 New Hudson
« Reply #24 on: October 15, 2015, 11:00:13 PM »

A big single maybe, but this is a little one - 3 h.p. and about 375cc from memory.

3 rated hp, or 3 hp developed though ?
Somewhat later, bikes rated at 3.5hp (ie 500cc) usually developed 10 to 12 actual hp, and thats as a sidevalve.
Good for 60 mph (although thats pushing it some on a 1909 !).

Originality is all very well, but 25 mph is a bit restrictive, any plans to try it with a more conventional carb ?
No self repecting owner of a 1909 would have stayed with that a few years later, the press was full of adverts for improved carbs.... ?

Lovely bike, btw.

Offline P.V. Motorcycles

  • Advanced Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 51
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: 1902 New Hudson
« Reply #25 on: October 17, 2015, 09:15:54 AM »
Excellent - I have rather a soft spot for those early spray carburettors, which tended to look like plumbing fittings, and whose design changed radically for each new season.

The 1909/10 AMAC with its two 'diver's helmets' must be the pick of the bunch.
Are they efficient carburettors? By today's standards, absolutely not - but with some deft rider input on the levers, it's perfectly possible to keep one of these mild-mannered engines chugging along quite happily.

I'd say it's rather a case of 'apples and oranges' to compare it to a later 500cc (nominal 3 1/2 hp) - and it depends what you mean by 'later'.

Aside from the primitive carb, it's likely to have no valve overlap, and little more than the length of the induction stroke as the dwell for the inlet cam.
Run it where it's happiest, I say.

N