Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - 33d6

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 85
1
British Bikes / Re: “Star” motorcycles
« on: March 12, 2026, 12:58:30 AM »
Yes, the Villiers industrial side is boring. Their four stroke industrial engines were in response to War Office demands for small engines opening up a new market for them which they kept on with post war. Their motorcycle engines and post war industrial two stroke engines diverged mightily with little in common. The industrial side essentially stayed with 1930's design and technology, basic and cheap but irrelevant for motorcycles..
They bought out both JAP and BSA industrial engines but eventually got caught up in the whole motorcycle industry amalgamation thing when AMC folded. By then Francis Barnett and James were their major motorcycle engine customers, both owned by AMC who also owned Norton. I don't know all the financial shenanigans but the British manufacturing industry was collapsing everywhere which left Villiers no one to supply with their engines. It doesn't matter what you make, if your customers disappear you're dead in the water.
About all the industrial side is good for is as a source of ignition spares and the occasional piston otherwise irrelevant.
 

2
British Bikes / Re: “Star” motorcycles
« on: March 11, 2026, 09:04:48 AM »
As you say Leon, interesting reading. I’d hate to be an accountant trying to make sense of all the financial shenanigans in and around the various Williams family members. They all looked out for each other and equitably shared out the proceeds but what a tangle.
I too would like to read the next few pages.
And Reg got his dates a little wrong with the Villiers factory in Ballarat. Was set up in the mid-50’s just in time to greet the Japanese coming into the market. As we know, it didn’t end well for Villiers.

3
British Bikes / Re: “Star” motorcycles
« on: March 10, 2026, 12:38:10 AM »
At least one Villiers powered Star survives (sort of). I saw it for sale at the VVMCC Scoresby Swapmeet a few years back. Supposedly restored it wasn't done well plus the original Mk XII-C engine had been swapped out for an earlier MK VI-C retrieved from an Atco lawnmower. 
I've long since learnt it never goes down well telling a hopeful owner that his exotic and rare early Villiers engine is in fact a rather common lawnmower engine. Yes the MK VI-C was only used in motorcycles for 1923 but it survived for many many years afterwards for lawnmower use. Anyway, a surviving Star with incorrect engine is better than no Star at all. I hope its still around.

I too found the Williams notes fascinating and the Velo remarks do tie in well with Phil Irving's autobiography but reading them was a pain as when expanded the page was too big for my computer screen. Manoeuvring them around to read was a pain and I probably missed a few of the more subtle points. Pity about that. 

4
British Bikes / Re: Villiers 196 super sports
« on: February 21, 2026, 04:33:16 AM »
Get thee behind me, Satan.

5
British Bikes / Re: Villiers 196 super sports
« on: February 20, 2026, 01:13:06 PM »
Yes, that Elliot is pure Wolf Vixen but the advert isn’t clear enough to ascertain which forks.

I’d like to get the Wolf but I’ve too many unfinished projects sitting around already. I really don’t need the distraction of another bike, tempting though it may be.

As for dating that Acme as 1936, some owners just seem to have wild fantasies about what they have regardless of reality. They just don’t want to know.

6
British Bikes / Re: Villiers 196 super sports
« on: February 20, 2026, 12:27:04 AM »
I too sent an email to the auctioneer pointing out both the Acme frame and engine numbers indicate a post-war model. No reply yet.
My interest lies with next Villiers powered lightweight, the Wolf. This one they nearly got right. Its a 1932 Wolf  ‘Vixen’, not 1931 as claimed. That was an easy one as I have copies of all Wolf catalogues from 1931. The Vixen was first catalogued in 1932 and those particular Webb front forks were only fitted to the initial 1932 model. Satchwell forks for every year there on. It has much more potential for a fun bike than the Acme.

7
British Bikes / Re: Villiers 196 super sports
« on: February 16, 2026, 11:52:49 AM »
They are very definitely compression olives. They are not the usual soldered on brass jobbies as Leon suggests. They are one of the reasons the system was found untrustworthy. Theoretically they are limited use items and can only be dismantled and replaced very few times before they are too crushed to reuse. Good luck with that with your average Short Arms/Long Pocket rider. Both olives AND pipe should be replaced every time they are removed. Never happens of course.
Sorry I can’t remember the thread, straight, not tapered BSP rings a bell. Easy enough to try a few standard BSP fittings. I’d start with 1/4’’ BSP.
The most important to keep tight is the line from engine to oil tank. The system relies on this line to pressurise the tank to push the oil up to the sight feed where it falls by gravity down to the engine. Both lines need to be tight but a faintly slack pressurising line is rapidly catastrophic.
Laying the lines properly is equally important.. The last SOS I saw had the delivery line rise upwards from the sight feed to be neatly tucked away under the tank before eventually dropping to the engine. Good luck getting that one to work reliably.
All in all the Villiers system can work well but the only safe way you can tell its working properly is to visually check the oil level every time you stop to see how much is being used. And it needs to use a lot. There is no viewing bubble as found in later era Japanese bikes and that brings its own minor complications. Dipstick anyone ?
As you may gather I am not a fan. Petroil may not be elegant but it is reliable.

8
British Bikes / Re: Villiers battery charging system ?
« on: December 17, 2025, 09:41:51 PM »
I can only answer that with the classic response “It depends”. Villiers made made flywheel magneto’s for some 50 odd years and made them by the million. No one knows all the subtleties that arose over the years. Just remember Villiers made these units as matching pairs and numbered them accordingly. It’s easy to check whether they are factory originals. After that you’re on your own.

9
British Bikes / Re: Villiers battery charging system ?
« on: December 17, 2025, 08:12:35 AM »
I’ve hunted out the magnet details for you R. Magnets on the 18 watt job are 1&1/8”wide and the 24watt magnets are 1&7/16”. The difference is in their width.
One has to be careful with Villiers magnetoes. There can be subtle differences that are never mentioned anywhere. For example the overall flywheel width of the near identical post war 10D and 6E engines are different, the 10D is 1&7/8” and the 6E 2&1/16”. I’ve never bothered to measure the actual magnets. This is never mentioned anywhere in any Villiers manual I’ve seen. I suspect it never occurred to Villiers that it would ever become relevant.

10
British Bikes / Re: Villiers battery charging system ?
« on: December 17, 2025, 01:37:07 AM »
We'll have to agree to disagree on that one Rex. Sadly I think the British motorcycle industry dropped the ball badly with their lightweights in the 50s & 60's. I own nothing but British but only of the late 20's with some 30's stuff and when I compare them to models made by the same factories 20 -30 years later I find they're just making an updated version of the same thing with little improvement in economy, performance or braking. Definitely better in suspension related areas but not much else. The expression polishing a t**d comes to mind. Fresh ideas and a fresh approach were needed and it didn't happen.
Although I'm no fan of their odd combined kickstart/gear lever setup I have to admit the Jawa/CZ's of the same period are markedly better and and German two-strokes of the period were magnificent. It's just a pity that their motorcycle industry collapsed when the German economy reached take off point and the average citizen could afford a car leaving two-wheelers behind. As for TWN, a friend had a TWN Contessa scooter and it had no problem maintaining station with the 350 Ariel I was riding at the time. And it had electric start when such a thing was quite exotic.
I enjoy playing with my Villiers stuff but I have no illusions that it could've been better.

 
   

11
British Bikes / Re: Villiers battery charging system ?
« on: December 16, 2025, 11:01:06 AM »
For various reasons I haven't been looking here much lately so have come in at the end of the above chatter. I gather from what has been said on previous occasions that you are writing about your 9D powered Waratah/Excelsior R. If so you don't seem to have a relevant Villiers manual which does make it a little tricky. I'll start with the first question and try to work through them all.
Of course there's no voltage control. Can you think of any British bike of the time that DID have voltage control on an AC system? I think Triumph were more or less the first major factory to fit alternators. They had the same lack of voltage control and those following weren't much better. I remember much unhappiness about batteries boiling dry and other woes in the early years of it all and a distinct lack of enthusiasm about the infamous multi-terminal Lucas combined ignition and lighting switch. What was it? the PS or PSR8? It's no consolation but Villiers were no more and no less ghastly than much more expensive machinery. Let's face it post-war British motorcycle electrics were never world leaders.
Essentially the factories fitted only the one size 6Volt battery, I don't think they had much option. I think it was the only one available and it seems as it acted as some sort of electrical buffer in these systems. They all seemed to revert to the old three brush dynamo idea of a daylight charging rate and a night time head lights on charging rate which never worked particularly well. I'm no electrician, maybe there was some sort of secret to it.
Next, there were two lighting systems used on the 9D. From memory, 18 watt or 24 watt systems. The lower wattage having both fewer coils and smaller magnets. You appear to have the lower wattage cheaper system fitted. Perhaps this was one of the ways the factory differentiated between an Excelsior or a Waratah. I don't know. Whatever, they are both standard Villiers systems of their day but you have to work to the limitations of each.
As for light switches Villiers supplied a relevant light switch for whatever lighting system you used, rectified lighting with a battery or directly off the lighting coils. The four position switch was late on the scene, well after your wee bike. Before Villiers provided this switch to change between steady battery lighting for town use and 'direct' lighting for country running the knowing rider wired in an extra dip switch and used that to flick between the two systems. Eventually it dawned on Villiers that they could add the dip- switch trick to their standard switch and sell it as a standard function but as your bike predates this you could use the extra dip switch concept as being absolutely correct for the time. Just remember that LED's probably wouldn't like the change to direct lighting too much. They're rather keen on a steady current without erratic swings. It's an arrangement for old fashioned bulbs only.
Finally I'm in complete agreement with the idea of a brake/stop light on any bike. I have absolutely no faith in any following traffic.
Anything else I need to cover?   

12
British Bikes / Re: Villiers headlamp switch
« on: October 26, 2025, 05:14:57 AM »
We're going around in circles here. I think the best solution is that of Jferg also occasional forum visitor. When necessary he uses a clip on LED bicycle rear lamp that he has slightly modified to come on with the usual m'cycle stop light switch. This can be easily removed or changed from bike to bike with minimal mucking about. That's an idea worth exploring further. Go and have a look in your local sweatwheel shop, R. You might come away much happier.

13
British Bikes / Re: Villiers headlamp switch
« on: October 23, 2025, 10:48:57 AM »
I understand your lack of concern over lighting. Who does expect to go riding one of these beastliest at night anyway BUT, (there’s always a but) you do occasionally get caught out. Country town rides and rallies have caught me out a few times, somehow you end up at a local riders home or a different pub and bingo, it’s got dark quicker than you expected. I also like to have a brake/stop light fitted. I have little faith in the road users    following behind. Many only react to brake lights and never think beyond them.
You can fit a battery powered total loss system but then you’re always faffing around charging up batteries. Fit a basic direct lighting set up and you always have no hassle lighting but the brake light set up is iffy. There’s never an easy and simple 100% satisfactory solution is there.

I smiled at the 4.5v battery chatter. They can be sheer frustration. I don’t know exactly when they went off the market and I have mucked around making them up from two ‘D’ cells but eventually I got fed up and stopped bothering. I don’t know how many hours light they originally gave but wangling a replacement in and out of that headlight clip every month or so would drive me nuts.

14
British Bikes / Re: Villiers headlamp switch
« on: October 20, 2025, 11:12:53 AM »
Still driving me nuts getting in. Won’t accept my ‘forever’ login and makes me sign in twice but at least I’m here.
Given that the electrics of the 9D changed over its production run and that a specified rear tail lamp bulb for those electrics wasn’t being made post war and no one knew if it would be again things got a little strange at times. The best advice I’ve found for all these circumstances is in Brownings coverage of the 9D in the early editions of his ‘The Villiers engine’ published by Persons, (definitely not Pitmans).
On top of that you need to consider whether you go for either of the Villiers standard options. Direct lighting that only runs when the engine runs or basic rectified lighting with battery but barely practical nowadays or best of all go for broke with modern electronics. Villiers copes with that surprisingly easy.
Do a little more research before you pile in.

15
British Bikes / Re: Villiers headlamp switch
« on: October 18, 2025, 06:16:54 AM »
This is just to say I'm finding it near impossible to get on to this site. I thought it was my old computer which was having various painful bothers but I now have a new computer and if anything things are worse. I've had a real dance around to get on and much emphasis from my new electronic friend about the lack of security involved in getting on.
Does anyone know if Nigel is still supporting it? From the lack of traffic I don't think so.

As for your Villiers switch R I think expecting anything straightforward from any bike produced in the 1945-46 immediate post war period is being very hopeful. As far as I can make out bikes were built up with whatever material manufacturers could get their hands on. The Vic State engine number records show the early post war Excelsior all to be fitted with ex-WD engines. The post war engine numbers start several months later, presumably from a later shipment of bikes. What type of engine number is on your Waratah. Ex-WD AAA****A vertically on the back of the gearbox or post war style on the R/H side gearbox cover? And yes, Villiers seemed to have close links with Miller as they did with Albion but I don't know how formal these were. I've never managed to pin these associations down. Villiers, Miller and Albion have never been treated kindly by the British motorcycle fan base. They seem to find it hard to get beyond the Boring Big Three. C'est la vie.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 85