Author Topic: 1953 tiger 100  (Read 9335 times)

Offline iansoady

  • Advanced Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 734
  • Karma: +6/-1
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: 1953 tiger 100
« Reply #15 on: July 06, 2017, 10:30:46 AM »
I'm all ok with that but the question I have is this,once the drain plug is undone , does the oil  naturally find its way out by gravity or do I need to somehow help it through from the tank to the drain plug?
Surely I can release the pipe from said oil tank and drain oil tank directly aswell as open drain plug?



As mentioned, the majority of the oil is (should be) retained in the oil tank which needs to be drained separately. All that should be in the crankcase is a few ccs. Triumph plunger oil pumps aren't as prone to wet sumping as the gear types fitted (especially) to Nortons.

The advice to clean the gauze is good.
Ian
1964 Norton Electra
1969 BSA/Suzuki
1992 Yamaha 250SRV

Offline L.A.B.

  • Advanced Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1534
  • Karma: +32/-4
    • View Profile
Re: 1953 tiger 100
« Reply #16 on: July 06, 2017, 10:49:31 AM »

Crankcase not sump

Sump is perfectly acceptable and is used repeatedly in manuals of the period including the Triumph one I posted the link to.

http://www.classicbike.biz/Triumph/Repair/45-55/45-55TriumphRepair.pdf

Quote
ENGINE LUBRICATION SYSTEM

The dry sump lubrication system is employed on all Triumph engines. .........
......sump plate.......
 
.....and finally drains into the sump. etc.

L.A.B.

Offline mini-me

  • Advanced Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1084
  • Karma: +19/-24
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: 1953 tiger 100
« Reply #17 on: July 06, 2017, 04:11:49 PM »

Crankcase not sump

Sump is perfectly acceptable and is used repeatedly in manuals of the period including the Triumph one I posted the link to.

http://www.classicbike.biz/Triumph/Repair/45-55/45-55TriumphRepair.pdf

Quote
ENGINE LUBRICATION SYSTEM

The dry sump lubrication system is employed on all Triumph engines. .........
......sump plate.......
 
.....and finally drains into the sump. etc.



Obviously the book is wrong ::) ::) ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline iansoady

  • Advanced Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 734
  • Karma: +6/-1
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: 1953 tiger 100
« Reply #18 on: July 06, 2017, 04:21:45 PM »
Triumphs did always try to appeal to the transatlantic market.

However, dry sump is a perfectly good term.

If one were to be pedantic, a sump is in fact a reservoir so dry sump is really an oxymoron. Although the OED has a slightly different view:
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/sump
Ian
1964 Norton Electra
1969 BSA/Suzuki
1992 Yamaha 250SRV

Offline mini-me

  • Advanced Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1084
  • Karma: +19/-24
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: 1953 tiger 100
« Reply #19 on: July 06, 2017, 08:16:22 PM »
and of course Sump is  on-line bike magazine........

Offline L.A.B.

  • Advanced Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1534
  • Karma: +32/-4
    • View Profile
Re: 1953 tiger 100
« Reply #20 on: July 06, 2017, 09:27:04 PM »
Triumphs did always try to appeal to the transatlantic market.


'Sump', 'dry sump' etc. are terms commonly found in the literature of many British manufacturers including AJS, BSA, Norton, etc, etc. and has little to do with any transatlantic market terminology as Americans usually call it an 'oil pan'.

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/oil-pan   
L.A.B.